Friday, May 16, 2008

Teenager Injured in Football Game Receives Jury Award of $7.57 Million for Missed Diagnosis by Treating Doctors

Stephen Allen Jamieson won a jury trial in the amount of $7.57 million dollars on behalf of a 19-year-old who had received a medical treatment far below the standard of care including a misdiagnosis of a bleed on his brain. This case was tried in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Southwest District (Torrance) before the Honorable Lois Smaltz.

In September 1995, the then 16-year-old plaintiff was practicing with his high school football team when he sustained several hard hits to the head from another player. In the evening his parents took him to the Urgent Care Center. The doctor failed to properly diagnose the problem as a concussion. There were no radiographic films done, no CT scan done. The doctor misdiagnosed the problem as dehydration and failed to place any definite limitation of the plaintiff’s participation in football over the next few days.

Two days later, the teenager collapsed on the playing field within a few minutes of the start of the football game. He was later diagnosed with a massive brain hemorrhage and was comatose for a month. He was left with brain damage resulting in loss of function in one arm and one leg and cognitive deficiencies.

Solomon, Saltsman and Jamieson filed a lawsuit for negligence against the school district as well as the doctor, the Urgent Care Center for which he worked, and the hospital that sponsored the Urgent Care Center.

The defendants in this action vigorously litigated this matter. There were over thirty depositions taken. Expert witnesses were required in many different fields such as athletic training, accident reconstruction, biomechanics, engineering and sports of psychology. The malpractice issue required the hiring of medical experts such as a neuropsychiatrists and psychologists. After more than two years, Mr. Jamieson and Stephen W. Solomon settled with the school district for $1,800,000.

Four months later Stephen Jamieson took the case against the urgent care doctor and his employers to trial before a superior court in Torrance, California. The medical issues were perceived by the defense to be the weaker portion of the case, particularly considering that Torrance is a relatively conservative jurisdiction, and that there are inherent difficulties associated with a medical malpractice action (i.e., MICRA limitations).

Therefore, the defense offered only $50,000 prior to trial. After three weeks in trial, Mr. Jamieson convinced the jury to return a verdict in the amount of $7,570,000.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

City TV Airs Legal Help Live

City TV Airs
Legal Help Live
Terence Lyons,
Santa Monica Mirror

If you associate live television only with the likes of Sid Caesar or Uncle Miltie, or you think the “live” in television died out in the late 1950s, think again. Legal Help Live has taken the drama and spontaneity of talk radio, added the thoughtfulness and some of the humor of a Steve Allen project and put it on television – on Santa Monica’s CityTV, channel 16 (and channel 36 in Los Angeles) to be exact.




The show features the lawyers of Solomon, Saltsman & Jamieson, a Westside firm that practices in a variety of legal fields (including even Indian gaming law; details below). Last week, this reporter had an opportunity to sit in “the studio” (also known as the Santa Monica City Council chambers) for an hour of on-air legal questions and answers, and to talk off-camera with the lawyers.

Legal Help Live is a one-hour show – airing Wednesdays at 4:00 p.m. – in which two partners from the firm field questions from telephone callers on everything from serious traffic accident injuries to identity theft to elder abuse. Last Wednesday, February 7, Brian from Santa Monica asked about a DUI, Joe from Sun Valley wanted an update on medical marijuana dispensaries and Amos inquired as to what could be done about potholes in the San Fernando Valley, among other calls.

The show began in 2000 as a radio program on KRLA in which firm lawyers presented a moderated debate on various legal subjects from week to week, explained partner Ralph Saltsman. The station began to get calls from listeners wanting to put questions to the lawyers, and so the show evolved into the call-in format in response to audience demand. That required less preparation time than the debates, the lawyers said, but it also required a lot of thinking-on-your-feet (or in-your-seat) in front of an open microphone.

Article referred to on broadcast

The call-in format on live television also provides an impromptu atmosphere and the opportunity for the lawyers to engage in entertaining riposte and repartee, whether it is on the subject of a caller’s question or current topics in the law which the lawyers themselves raise from time to time. Stephen Solomon, for example, tends to more conservative views (from favoring the death penalty to eating meat) while Ralph Saltsman leans more to the left. (And, lawyers being lawyers, this reporter imagines that they can create friendly disagreement on the spot.)

After the show had been on radio for about five years, CityTV manager Robin Gee and a colleague from LA’s cable channel 36 came to a studio session and later asked the firm to bring the show to television, where it has been for about two years now.

Senior partner Stephen Solomon has been practicing law since the 1960s, when he started in Santa Monica and officed in Ernie White’s insurance building at Arizona Avenue and Lincoln Boulevard. An early client who operated a local nightclub caused Solomon to develop some expertise in what lawyers call “ABC law” (as in, the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control), and when years later an American Indian tribe had a liquor license problem, he wound up developing expertise in Indian gaming law, and now represents several tribes.

The lawyers say that although they get “a lot of follow-up calls” from TV callers letting them know how the on-air advice worked out, the show has not really resulted in paying business to the law firm. Nevertheless, they keep the call-in telephone number live to their offices between shows, and younger associate lawyers in the firm offer advice and guidance to 25 or 30 callers a week. “We look upon it as a public service,” says partner Stephen Jamieson.